When a tenant loses an eviction case and chooses to attraction that call, a subsequent authorized continuing could also be required, typically regarding a monetary assure. This listening to determines whether or not the tenant should submit a bond to stay within the property through the attraction course of. The aim of this bond is to guard the owner financially, protecting potential damages or unpaid hire which may accrue whereas the attraction is pending. Failure to safe this bond may end up in the rapid execution of the eviction order, even whereas the attraction is underway. As an illustration, if a tenant appeals an eviction for non-payment of hire, the court docket may require a bond equal to the quantity of hire owed, plus potential court docket prices, to make sure the owner is compensated ought to the attraction be unsuccessful.
The requirement for such a listening to and the next bond is designed to steadiness the rights of each the owner and the tenant. It prevents frivolous appeals supposed solely to delay the eviction course of, which may end in important monetary losses for the property proprietor. Traditionally, such protections have been typically missing, leaving landlords weak to prolonged and expensive delays. This mechanism ensures that whereas a tenant has the best to attraction, this proper is exercised responsibly and doesn’t unfairly drawback the owner. The result offers a safeguard in opposition to abuse of the attraction course of whereas upholding the best to due course of.
