A court docket order outlining parental duties concerning a toddler can develop into unenforceable underneath particular circumstances. These circumstances sometimes contain actions or occasions that basically alter the idea upon which the unique order was established, rendering it now not relevant or equitable. For instance, a father or mother’s relocation to a distant state with out correct notification and court docket approval may current grounds for reevaluation of the present custody association.
The integrity of kid custody preparations is paramount for making certain stability and well-being. Sustaining a sound and enforceable order gives readability and predictability for all events concerned, notably the kid. Traditionally, courts have persistently emphasised the significance of upholding these preparations until compelling causes necessitate modification or termination, prioritizing the kid’s greatest pursuits above all else. This framework affords safety in opposition to arbitrary modifications and promotes a secure setting.
The next sections will study particular occasions and actions that may result in the unenforceability of those agreements, specializing in areas comparable to parental relocation, proof of abuse or neglect, substantial modifications in circumstances affecting the kid, and failure to stick to the order’s stipulations.
1. Relocation out of state
Parental relocation throughout state strains constitutes a major issue that may render a custody settlement unenforceable. The unique order is often predicated on the premise that each dad and mom reside inside an affordable geographic proximity, facilitating common visitation and shared parental duties. A transfer to a different state basically alters this premise, doubtlessly disrupting the established visitation schedule and making joint decision-making tougher. Courts usually view such relocations as a considerable change in circumstances, triggering a evaluate of the present custody association. For example, if a custodial father or mother strikes a number of hundred miles away, making weekly visits unimaginable, the non-custodial father or mother might petition the court docket to change the order, doubtlessly in search of major custody or a revised visitation schedule that accommodates the gap.
The affect of relocation on a custody settlement relies upon closely on a number of elements, together with the phrases of the unique order, the explanations for the transfer, and the potential impact on the kid. Many custody orders include provisions that particularly handle relocation, outlining the method for in search of permission from the court docket or the opposite father or mother. Failure to adjust to these provisions can lead to authorized penalties, together with a change in custody. Furthermore, even when the order is silent on relocation, a court docket should still think about the transfer to be a violation of the spirit of the settlement if it demonstrably harms the kid’s relationship with the non-relocating father or mother. For instance, a father or mother relocating solely to hinder the opposite father or mother’s entry to the kid is more likely to face authorized repercussions.
In abstract, relocation out of state is a potent set off for reevaluation of custody agreements. Its impact hinges on the specifics of the unique order, the justification for the transfer, and the potential disruption to the kid’s relationship with each dad and mom. Understanding the authorized framework surrounding relocation is essential for folks considering a transfer and for making certain the continued enforceability of the custody association in mild of modified circumstances.
2. Baby abuse or neglect
Confirmed situations of kid abuse or neglect signify a paramount motive for invalidating a custody settlement. The authorized framework governing custody prioritizes the protection and well-being of the kid above all different concerns. Proof demonstrating {that a} father or mother has engaged in abusive or neglectful conduct immediately undermines the elemental precept upon which the custody association was initially established. This proof presents compelling grounds for instant court docket intervention and potential termination of the present order. For instance, a discovering of bodily abuse, sexual abuse, or extreme neglect, substantiated by credible experiences from medical professionals, little one protecting companies, or legislation enforcement, sometimes leads to a swift modification of the custody order, doubtlessly eradicating the kid from the offending father or mother’s care.
The affect of substantiated abuse or neglect on a custody settlement extends past merely altering the custodial preparations. It will probably additionally result in restrictions on visitation rights, obligatory remedy for the offending father or mother, and ongoing supervision by little one protecting companies. Courts usually impose stringent safeguards to make sure the kid’s security and forestall future hurt. Moreover, the burden of proof shifts considerably in instances involving abuse or neglect. The father or mother accused of such conduct should display that they pose no risk to the kid’s well-being. Failure to take action can lead to the everlasting lack of custody and restricted contact. Think about a state of affairs the place a father or mother is convicted of driving underneath the affect with the kid within the car; this may very well be thought-about neglect, resulting in a evaluate and potential voiding of the present custody settlement.
In abstract, little one abuse or neglect serves as a important determinant in rendering a custody settlement unenforceable. The authorized system operates underneath the presumption {that a} kid’s security is paramount, and any proof of abuse or neglect triggers instant and decisive motion. The implications for a father or mother discovered to have engaged in such conduct are extreme, doubtlessly resulting in the lack of custody and restricted contact with the kid. This underscores the significance of safeguarding youngsters and prioritizing their well-being in all custody-related issues.
3. Parental incapacitation/demise
Parental incapacitation or demise constitutes a elementary alteration of circumstances that immediately impacts the enforceability of a kid custody settlement. The unique order relies on the existence and capability of each dad and mom to meet their designated roles and duties. The absence of 1 father or mother, whether or not via demise or incapacitation, necessitates a reevaluation of the custody association.
-
Authorized Termination of Parental Rights
The demise of a father or mother routinely terminates their parental rights. Incapacitation, if legally decided by a court docket, can even result in the termination of parental rights if the father or mother is deemed unable to look after the kid. This elimination of parental rights successfully voids the unique custody settlement, because it depends on the involvement of two succesful dad and mom. For instance, a father or mother in a coma with no prospect of restoration might have their parental rights terminated, resulting in a brand new custody willpower.
-
Affect on Custody and Visitation Schedules
The established custody and visitation schedules develop into unimaginable to take care of when a father or mother dies or turns into incapacitated. The surviving father or mother sometimes assumes full custody, until there’s a compelling motive to award custody to a different social gathering, comparable to a grandparent or different relative. A beforehand established schedule with shared bodily custody would essentially be rendered out of date. A father or mother incapacitated attributable to a extreme accident, as an example, could also be unable to offer any care, thus altering the bodily custody association.
-
Finest Pursuits of the Baby
In instances of parental demise or incapacitation, the court docket’s major focus stays the most effective pursuits of the kid. This may increasingly contain modifying the custody order to make sure the kid’s continued care and well-being. The court docket will think about elements such because the kid’s relationship with the surviving father or mother, the suitability of different caregivers, and the kid’s emotional wants. If the surviving father or mother is deemed unfit, the court docket might award custody to a relative or place the kid in foster care. The final word determination is guided by what promotes the childs security, stability, and emotional growth.
-
Guardianship and Authorized Illustration
Following parental demise or incapacitation, the court docket usually appoints a guardian for the kid. This guardian, who might or might not be the identical because the custodian, manages the kid’s belongings and makes authorized selections on their behalf. Moreover, the court docket might appoint a authorized consultant for the kid to make sure their pursuits are protected all through the custody proceedings. These appointments replicate the heightened want for authorized oversight and advocacy in conditions the place a father or mother is now not capable of fulfill their parental duties. A guardian advert litem, for instance, will particularly advocate for the kid’s wants in court docket proceedings associated to modifying the custody order.
In conclusion, parental incapacitation or demise invariably voids the pre-existing custody settlement as a result of elementary incapability of 1 father or mother to take part as outlined within the unique order. The authorized system then intervenes to ascertain a brand new association, prioritizing the kid’s welfare and making certain continued care and help in mild of the modified circumstances. This course of underscores the adaptive nature of custody agreements in response to important life occasions.
4. Violation court docket order
A direct correlation exists between a violation of a court docket order and the potential invalidation of a custody settlement. Non-compliance with the stipulations outlined within the settlement constitutes a severe breach, undermining the court docket’s authority and doubtlessly jeopardizing the kid’s well-being. Repeated or egregious violations can present grounds for the court docket to change and even void the present order. For example, a custodial father or mother who persistently withholds visitation rights from the non-custodial father or mother, opposite to the court docket’s specific directions, is in violation. Such actions may immediate the non-custodial father or mother to petition the court docket for a modification of the custody association, doubtlessly in search of major custody or supervised visitation to make sure compliance.
The severity and frequency of the violation considerably affect the court docket’s response. A single, minor infraction might warrant a warning or a remedial measure, comparable to obligatory mediation. Nevertheless, persistent disregard for the court docket order, notably when it negatively impacts the kid, sometimes leads to extra stringent penalties. Examples embrace imposing fines, requiring neighborhood service, and even incarcerating the violating father or mother. In excessive instances, the place the violation demonstrates a sample of disregard for the kid’s greatest pursuits or poses a danger to their security, the court docket might deem the present custody settlement unenforceable and problem a brand new order that displays the modified circumstances and prioritizes the kid’s safety. The sensible impact of this understanding is that oldsters should scrupulously adhere to the phrases of the custody settlement to keep away from jeopardizing their custodial rights.
In abstract, violation of a court docket order serves as a key determinant in assessing the continued validity of a custody settlement. Whereas not each infraction routinely voids the settlement, persistent or extreme violations can set off a authorized course of that results in modification or termination, in the end emphasizing the paramount significance of adhering to the court docket’s directives and prioritizing the kid’s welfare. Understanding the potential penalties of non-compliance is essential for all events concerned in custody preparations, making certain a secure and legally sound setting for the kid.
5. Kid’s desire modifications
A toddler’s evolving desire concerning custodial preparations can contribute to the potential unenforceability of a custody settlement, although it’s not often the only real figuring out issue. Courts typically prioritize stability and continuity in a toddler’s life. Nevertheless, as a toddler matures and develops the capability to kind reasoned opinions, their expressed needs achieve growing weight in judicial concerns. The affect of a kid’s desire is often contingent upon their age, maturity, the articulation of clear and logical causes for the desire, and the absence of undue affect from both father or mother. For instance, an adolescent expressing a powerful and well-reasoned need to reside with a selected father or mother, citing elements comparable to instructional alternatives or a extra supportive house setting, might affect the court docket’s determination to change a long-standing custody settlement. Such concerns are balanced in opposition to the potential disruption brought on by altering the established order.
The sensible software of contemplating a toddler’s desire varies throughout jurisdictions and relies on the particular circumstances of the case. Some jurisdictions have statutes that explicitly define the age at which a toddler’s desire must be given important weight. Even within the absence of particular laws, courts usually interview youngsters privately, or appoint a guardian advert litem to signify the kid’s pursuits, to determine their needs and guarantee they’re heard. Nevertheless, it’s essential to acknowledge {that a} kid’s desire is only one issue amongst many who the court docket considers. Different elements, comparable to every father or mother’s potential to offer a secure and nurturing setting, the kid’s relationship with siblings, and any historical past of abuse or neglect, proceed to carry important significance. The desire of the kid does not routinely void the settlement; it serves as important data throughout re-evaluation and modifications.
In conclusion, whereas a toddler’s altering desire can contribute to the reevaluation of a custody settlement, it not often acts as an impartial trigger for rendering it unenforceable. The authorized system emphasizes a holistic evaluation of the kid’s greatest pursuits, bearing in mind their age, maturity, the explanations behind their desire, and a large number of different elements. The problem lies in balancing the need to respect the kid’s autonomy with the necessity to present stability and safety. Understanding this dynamic is important for folks navigating custody preparations and in search of modifications that really serve the kid’s evolving wants.
6. Substantial change circumstances
Substantial modifications in circumstances are a major catalyst for rendering a toddler custody settlement unenforceable. The muse of a custody order rests upon the circumstances current on the time of its issuance. If these circumstances endure important alteration, the unique order might now not adequately serve the kid’s greatest pursuits, thereby doubtlessly voiding the settlement. These modifications can embody a big selection of occasions, together with however not restricted to, a father or mother’s remarriage, a major change in both father or mother’s earnings, the event of a beforehand undiagnosed medical situation affecting the kid, or a documented shift within the kid’s instructional wants. The prevalence of those occasions creates a state of affairs whereby the court docket should re-evaluate the custody association to make sure it aligns with the kid’s present and future well-being. For instance, if a custodial father or mother experiences a extreme, debilitating sickness that renders them unable to look after the kid, this constitutes a considerable change in circumstances that would result in a modification or termination of the present custody order.
The direct consequence of a considerable change in circumstances is the authorized pathway to petition the court docket for a modification of the present custody settlement. This petition initiates a evaluate course of whereby the court docket examines the character and extent of the modified circumstances, assesses their affect on the kid, and determines whether or not a modification is critical to uphold the kid’s greatest pursuits. The burden of proof rests upon the social gathering in search of the modification to display {that a} substantial change has occurred and that the modification is within the kid’s greatest curiosity. For example, a father or mother in search of to relocate out of state with the kid should display that the transfer is useful for the kid’s instructional or developmental alternatives, even when the present settlement stipulates a sure geographic boundary. This course of exemplifies how substantial modifications immediate a reevaluation of the orders efficacy.
In conclusion, substantial modifications in circumstances function a pivotal mechanism for triggering the reevaluation and potential voiding of custody agreements. The authorized system acknowledges {that a} kid’s wants evolve over time, and that unexpected occasions can considerably affect the suitability of present custody preparations. By offering a pathway for modification primarily based on substantial modifications, the authorized framework ensures that custody agreements stay conscious of the kid’s evolving wants and proceed to prioritize their general well-being. The problem lies in precisely assessing the importance of the modifications and demonstrating their affect on the kid, requiring cautious documentation and authorized illustration to navigate the modification course of successfully.
7. Fraud throughout settlement
Fraudulent exercise perpetrated throughout the negotiation or execution of a custody settlement constitutes a elementary problem to its validity. The integrity of the authorized course of hinges on the honesty and transparency of all events concerned. When one social gathering deliberately misrepresents or conceals important data, the ensuing settlement is tainted, doubtlessly rendering it unenforceable. This fraudulent exercise undermines the very foundation upon which the court docket made its willpower, because the order was predicated on incomplete or false premises. For instance, if a father or mother conceals a historical past of substance abuse or a legal file throughout custody negotiations, the ensuing settlement, which can grant that father or mother unsupervised entry to the kid, turns into inherently flawed. The invention of this fraud gives grounds for the opposite father or mother to petition the court docket to void the present settlement and set up a brand new order primarily based on correct data.
The detection of fraud in custody agreements carries important sensible implications. It necessitates an intensive reevaluation of the kid’s greatest pursuits in mild of the newly revealed data. The court docket should assess the extent to which the fraud impacted the unique determination and decide what corrective measures are essential to guard the kid’s well-being. This course of might contain ordering psychological evaluations, conducting house research, and revisiting the custodial and visitation preparations. Moreover, the fraudulent social gathering might face authorized repercussions, together with sanctions and even legal expenses. Think about a situation the place a father or mother fraudulently claims to be the kid’s major caregiver, presenting falsified paperwork to help this declare. Upon discovery of the fraud, the court docket would probably award custody to the opposite father or mother and will impose penalties on the fraudulent social gathering for his or her misleading conduct. The sensible implications of such fraud are that the household will endure additional authorized challenges, presumably harming the kid and household relationships
In abstract, fraudulent exercise throughout the formation of a custody settlement constitutes a severe obstacle to its enforceability. It undermines the integrity of the authorized course of, jeopardizes the kid’s well-being, and necessitates an intensive reevaluation of the custody association. The challenges lie in detecting and proving the fraud, in addition to in mitigating its detrimental results on the kid. The significance of honesty and transparency in custody proceedings can’t be overstated, as it’s important for making certain that the ensuing settlement actually serves the kid’s greatest pursuits and upholds the rules of justice.
8. Mutual settlement rescind
The idea of “mutual settlement rescind” immediately pertains to the circumstances that render a custody settlement void. A custody order, whereas legally binding, might be dissolved when each dad and mom explicitly consent to its termination. This dissolution is achieved via a legally acknowledged course of the place each events formally agree that the present order is now not essential or relevant. The important thing component is the voluntary and knowledgeable consent of each dad and mom; absence of coercion or duress is crucial. This situation distinguishes itself from different causes for voiding an settlement, comparable to parental neglect or relocation, the place the court docket intervenes primarily based on unilateral actions or modified circumstances. For example, if dad and mom reconcile and resolve to cohabitate, collectively elevating their little one with out the necessity for court-mandated schedules and restrictions, they’ll petition the court docket to rescind the unique custody order by way of a mutual settlement. This successfully voids the prior settlement, changing it with their cooperative parenting association.
The sensible significance of mutual settlement rescind lies in its potential to replicate the evolving dynamics of a household. Custody orders are sometimes established during times of battle or separation. As time passes, relationships might enhance, and fogeys might develop a extra collaborative method to co-parenting. A mutual settlement to rescind permits them to formalize this new actuality, eliminating the constraints and potential conflicts related to the unique order. Nevertheless, it’s essential to emphasise that the court docket retains the last word authority to approve or deny the rescission. Even with a mutual settlement, the court docket will assess whether or not terminating the order is certainly within the kid’s greatest pursuits. This entails contemplating elements comparable to the soundness of the dad and mom’ relationship, their potential to speak successfully, and the potential affect on the kid’s emotional well-being. If the court docket determines that rescinding the order would create instability or expose the kid to danger, it might deny the request, underscoring the kid’s greatest pursuits.
In conclusion, “mutual settlement rescind” gives a pathway for folks to terminate a custody order when they’re in accord and consider that doing so serves their kid’s greatest pursuits. This mechanism underscores the dynamic nature of household legislation and the potential for evolving co-parenting relationships. Nevertheless, the court docket maintains oversight to make sure that any rescission genuinely advantages the kid and doesn’t undermine their security, stability, or emotional well-being. The rescission will even depend upon every state’s legal guidelines, in the event that they honor that request.
9. Adoption by others
Adoption by people aside from the kid’s present authorized dad and mom invariably voids any pre-existing custody settlement. The authorized framework surrounding adoption establishes new parental rights and duties, successfully terminating the rights of the organic dad and mom until particular exceptions apply, comparable to stepparent adoption. A custody order dictates the rights and duties of particular people; adoption basically alters these specificities. For example, if a toddler is legally adopted by a relative or unrelated social gathering, the adoptive dad and mom assume all parental rights, rendering the earlier custody order regarding the organic dad and mom out of date and unenforceable. This stems from the authorized precept that the adoptive dad and mom are henceforth deemed the kid’s authorized dad and mom in all respects. An instance features a state of affairs the place a toddler has been positioned in foster care attributable to parental neglect. If the foster dad and mom subsequently undertake the kid, the prior custody order pertaining to the organic dad and mom is routinely nullified.
The sensible significance of adoption as a voiding issue lies in its full switch of parental rights. It isn’t merely a modification of present rights, however a authorized substitution of 1 set of fogeys for an additional. As such, any pre-existing custody schedule, visitation rights, or parental decision-making authority detailed within the unique custody settlement turns into irrelevant. The adoptive dad and mom now possess the unique authorized authority to make selections concerning the kid’s upbringing, training, healthcare, and normal welfare. The method of adoption necessitates that the organic dad and mom both voluntarily relinquish their parental rights or have these rights terminated by a court docket attributable to elements comparable to abuse, neglect, or abandonment. This relinquishment or termination is a prerequisite for the adoption to proceed. In sensible phrases, the earlier guardians now haven’t any authorized rights to be with the kid.
In conclusion, adoption by others represents an unequivocal occasion that renders any prior custody settlement null and void. It results an entire and legally acknowledged change in parentage, transferring all rights and duties to the adoptive dad and mom. Whereas the method resulting in adoption might contain complicated authorized proceedings and concerns of the kid’s greatest pursuits, the end result is evident: the earlier custody association ceases to exist, supplanted by the brand new authorized actuality of the adoptive parent-child relationship. This understanding is essential for all events concerned in custody disputes, underscoring the permanence and finality of adoption in issues of parental rights and duties.
Regularly Requested Questions
This part addresses frequent inquiries concerning occasions and actions that may render a toddler custody settlement unenforceable. The knowledge offered is meant for normal information and shouldn’t be thought-about authorized recommendation.
Query 1: Can a father or mother’s remarriage routinely invalidate a custody settlement?
No, a father or mother’s remarriage, in and of itself, doesn’t routinely invalidate a custody settlement. Nevertheless, remarriage might be thought-about a change in circumstances, doubtlessly warranting a evaluate of the present order, notably if the brand new partner’s presence negatively impacts the kid’s well-being.
Query 2: Does a minor violation of the custody settlement instantly render it unenforceable?
Typically, no. A single, minor infraction of the custody settlement sometimes doesn’t render it unenforceable. Nevertheless, repeated violations, even when minor, or a single egregious violation, can result in a court docket evaluate and potential modification or termination of the settlement.
Query 3: If a toddler states they need to reside with the opposite father or mother, does that routinely change the custody settlement?
Not essentially. Whereas a toddler’s desire is an element, notably as they mature, it’s not the only real determinant. The court docket considers the kid’s age, maturity, the explanations for his or her desire, and the general greatest pursuits of the kid.
Query 4: What constitutes a “substantial change in circumstances” that would void a custody settlement?
A considerable change in circumstances refers to a major occasion that alters the circumstances upon which the unique custody order was primarily based. Examples embrace a father or mother’s relocation out of state, a extreme sickness affecting a father or mother’s potential to look after the kid, or proof of abuse or neglect.
Query 5: If a custody settlement was primarily based on fraudulent data, what recourse is out there?
If a custody settlement was obtained via fraudulent means, the aggrieved social gathering can petition the court docket to void the settlement. Proof of fraud, comparable to hid legal information or misrepresentation of earnings, can present grounds for a brand new custody willpower.
Query 6: Can dad and mom merely agree between themselves to ignore the custody settlement?
Whereas dad and mom can mutually comply with deviate from the custody settlement briefly, the settlement stays legally binding until formally modified or terminated by the court docket. A proper mutual settlement to rescind, authorised by the court docket, is critical to completely void the present order. Disregarding a court docket order with out authorized modification can result in authorized repercussions.
Key takeaways: A number of elements can problem the enforceability of a custody settlement, however the court docket prioritizes the kid’s greatest pursuits above all else. Vital modifications in circumstances, proof of fraud, and chronic violations of the order are major concerns.
The next part will present assets for in search of additional authorized recommendation and help concerning little one custody issues.
Navigating Circumstances Impacting Custody Agreements
The next suggestions provide steering on addressing conditions that will have an effect on the enforceability of a kid custody settlement. These strategies are meant to advertise stability and shield the kid’s well-being whereas adhering to authorized necessities.
Tip 1: Adhere Strictly to the Present Order: Compliance with the phrases of the custody settlement is paramount. Doc situations of compliance and any deviations, even when agreed upon informally with the opposite father or mother. This documentation might be essential if disputes come up.
Tip 2: Search Authorized Counsel Promptly When Circumstances Change: When a major life occasion happens, comparable to relocation or a considerable change in earnings, seek the advice of with an lawyer. This session helps decide the potential affect on the custody settlement and the mandatory authorized steps.
Tip 3: Doc All Communication with the Different Father or mother: Preserve a file of all communication, particularly regarding modifications to visitation schedules or different facets of the custody settlement. This file gives proof of makes an attempt to cooperate and resolve points amicably.
Tip 4: Prioritize the Kid’s Finest Pursuits: When contemplating any motion that will have an effect on the custody association, prioritize the kid’s emotional and bodily well-being. Selections must be primarily based on what’s most useful for the kid, not solely on private needs.
Tip 5: Current Correct Data to the Courtroom: Honesty and transparency are important in all authorized proceedings. Concealing or misrepresenting info can have extreme penalties and undermine the validity of the custody settlement.
Tip 6: Be Conscious of State-Particular Legal guidelines: Baby custody legal guidelines differ considerably from state to state. Familiarize oneself with the particular legal guidelines within the related jurisdiction to make sure compliance and shield parental rights.
Tip 7: Mediate Disputes When Doable: Mediation affords a much less adversarial method to resolving custody-related disagreements. A impartial mediator may also help facilitate communication and discover options which might be mutually acceptable.
Upholding the integrity of a custody settlement requires diligence, adherence to authorized procedures, and a dedication to prioritizing the kid’s welfare. Searching for authorized steering and sustaining open communication may also help navigate difficult conditions and guarantee a secure setting for the kid.
The concluding part gives worthwhile assets for acquiring additional authorized help and steering associated to little one custody points.
What Voids a Custody Settlement
This exploration has illuminated the multifaceted circumstances underneath which a toddler custody settlement turns into unenforceable. Cases comparable to parental relocation, substantiated abuse or neglect, parental incapacitation or demise, court docket order violations, important modifications in a toddler’s expressed desire, substantial alterations in life circumstances, fraudulent exercise throughout the settlement’s formation, mutual rescission by each dad and mom, and adoption by others every signify potential triggers for a reevaluation or termination of the present custody association. The constant authorized thread weaving via these eventualities is the paramount consideration of the kid’s greatest pursuits, guiding the court docket’s selections and making certain the kid’s security and well-being stay the very best precedence.
The complexities inherent in little one custody disputes underscore the necessity for vigilant consciousness of authorized rights and duties. Mother and father navigating these issues are strongly inspired to hunt skilled authorized counsel to make sure an intensive understanding of relevant legal guidelines, shield their parental rights, and advocate successfully for his or her kid’s welfare. Continued vigilance and knowledgeable motion are important in sustaining a secure and supportive setting for youngsters affected by custody preparations, and a continuing understanding of “what voids a custody settlement”
